Lexisnexis

LexisNexis Corporate & Securities Law Community 2011 Top 50 Blogs

Bon mots

"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra

"We do not distain to borrow wit or wisdom from any man who is capable of lending us either." Henry Fielding, Tom Jones

"In our complex society the accountant's certificate and the lawyer's opinion can be instruments for inflicting pecuniary loss more potent than the chisel or the crowbar." United States v. Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854, 862 (2d Cir. 1964)

Default Based on Service of Attorney for Russian Respondent Upheld

Dan Rapoport, Exchange Act Rel. 63744, January 20, 2011

Rapoport, a Russian resident was found based on his default to have violated the securities laws. The ALJ barred him from broker-dealer association and ordered to cease and desist various violations. He was also ordered to pay penalties of $315,000.

Rapoport was charged with soliciting U.S. investors to purchase thinly traded Russian stocks. Process was served on an attorney who claimed to represent Rapoport pursuant to an order from the ALJ even though he claimed he was not authorized to accept service. That attorney appeared on behalf of Rapoport at several hearings. After the default order was entered against him, Rapoport was served with it by U.S. Customs when he entered the country. He then filed a motion with the ALJ to set aside the default which was denied.

Commission rules permit the ALJ to order alternative service methods. The Commission noted that the ALJ's order authorizing service on Rapoport's lawyer was appropriate and noted that such service has been upheld in the federal courts. The attorney represented to the ALJ that he would inform Rapoport of the judge's order that service be made upon the lawyer. The Commission ruled that since Rapoport had notice of the service of process, he could not ignore it.